Re: Star Trek Into Disappointment (spoilers abound)
My 11-year-old and I agreed that it was a great movie, specifically that it was much better than the first one. We really enjoyed it.
My only complaint was about the cinematography, which I thought was too jumbled, chaotic, and jumpy. But I liked the plot and story a lot. Best movie I've seen in quite a while.
I could have done without them putting Kirk in bed with two alien girls. That made for a fun ride home...
I have to agree with you. I was very skeptical about the movie, especially when I found out before hand about the plot twists, but I really liked where they went with this. It was much better than the first one, which isn't saying much, to be sure.
I'm going to have to disagree with Voleron's assessment of the franchise. It really sounds like you're trying to blame the victims here. The reason why the later Star Trek movies, especially Nemesis, sucked so bad, was just because of the greed of the studios. They didn't want to spend money on good writing, so we got junk. John Logan is such an unimaginative hack, and I knew he was just going to rehash other, better stories, like TWOK. Enterprise was also squarely in the lap of the studio. It's not that fans abandoned it. Remember that for the first season or so, they didn't even want to call it Star Trek so they didn't have to bother with canon.